Salma Ewing vs Sydney Jara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 08:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Ewing vs S. Jara

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ewing 1 - 0 Jara
They have played 2 sets in total, with Salma Ewing winning 2 and Sydney Jara winning 0. The last match between Salma Ewing and Sydney Jara was at the W100 Macon, 13-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Salma Ewing getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ewing | 1 |
| Jara | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W100 Macon(10-13-25)
S. Ewing vs S. Jara H2H Profile
S. Ewing vs S. Jara Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Salma Ewing has a slight edge in second serve effectiveness, capturing 41.44% of points, compared to Sydney Jara's 39.47%.
- Salma Ewing excels in return games, winning 51.35% of points on opponent's second serves, slightly ahead of Sydney's 49.72%.
- However, Sydney Jara leads in first serve return points with 36.90% against Salma Ewing's 33.14%. Which is more significant?
- The ability to handle pressure is nearly identical, with Salma saving 48.25% of breakpoints and Sydney saving 47.73%.
- Although Salma has a lower match win percentage (54.55% vs Sydney's 60%), Salma has competed against stronger opponents on average (ranked 95.16 vs 293.6).
- Both players are equally strong on hard courts with a win percentage of 59%.
- Salma mainly competes in higher-level ITF tournaments, while Sydney plays more Futures events. Is the match experience at different levels advantageous?
- In deciding sets, Sydney Jara holds a better record, winning 56% of these situations, compared to Salma's 46%.
- The performer's form at this specific event could sway the match outcome. Have they shown any particular advantage in this tournament location?
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to this exciting tennis matchup, it's essential to consider both players' recent performance trends and their ability to perform under pressure.
Salma Ewing shows slight superiority in second serve points won and return games, giving her an edge in prolonged rallies. Meanwhile, her extensive experience against higher-ranked opponents might prepare her for tougher challenges.
Sydney Jara, with a higher winning percentage in deciding sets, could potentially outlast Salma in a closely contested match. However, if the contest does not reach this stage, Salma's regular exposure to higher-caliber competition could be the deciding factor.
While both players are equally competent on hard courts, Salma's track record against stronger opponents makes her the more favored competitor to clinch this match, albeit narrowly.
Salma Ewing vs Sydney Jara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Ewing vs S. Jara H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:17:1 | Average Match Time | 1:17:1 |
| 50% (18/36) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 72% (13/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (27/44) | Return Points Win % | 19% (7/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Ewing Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
S. Jara Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 4-6 10-6 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | ||

S. Ewing vs S. Jara Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.61% (106/78) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.14% (16/12) |
| 56.67% (242/185) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.38% (36/29) |
| 53.83% (2086/1789) | Games Win/Loss | 53.73% (317/273) |
| 59.03% (85/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 53.85% (21/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 203 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 422 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
| 1:7:33 | Average Match Time | 1:2:31 |
| 409.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.54 |
| 57% (4203/7342) | 1st Serve % | 74% (750/1019) |
| 63% (2628/4203) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (399/750) |
| 46% (1437/3139) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (121/269) |
| 48% (450/940) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (59/120) |
| 47% (3351/7183) | Return Points Win % | 45% (438/978) |
| 50.00% (50/50) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 66.67% (56/28) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 59% (106/181) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 26% (8/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (30/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 82% (114/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
| 18% (114/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
| 19% (70/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (15/4) |